The Psychopathology of Anti-Racism

‘Anti-racism has become our century’s own civil religion’, says Pascal Bruckner, who authored a scandalous and exhilarating book entitled An Imaginary Racism. Because of this opinion (among other things), Bruckner has found himself ostracised, just like Finkielkraut, and is now on bad terms with our right-thinking intelligentsia, since he too now stands accused of Islamophobia, obviously.

For the dominant ideology, criticising anti-racism is immediately synonymous with being racist — a supreme abomination, as previously stated. This anti-racist ideology, which is completely contradictory as a result of its bias and tendency to overvalue ‘coloured people’ to the detriment of Whites, contributes to the profound racialisation of our society and will certainly prove to be an aggravating factor in an ethnic civil war characterised by its racial and racist dimensions.

Although Islam is a religion with a universal sort of mission, the fact remains that it relates, as already stated, to the ‘Arab’ race, because the majority of its followers are coloured, which explains why Islamophobia and racism are correlated, or sometimes even confused, and why Pascal Bruckner has immediately been labelled Islamophobic for simply criticising anti-racism! Anti-racism is a doctrinal creation stemming from both Whites and left-wing Jews that define themselves as Westerners but have all surrendered to self-loathing, i.e. to ethno-masochism. The harshest censorship or prosecution is thus directed against any Whites accused of racism. Why does this happen to Whites in particular, and much less to other races?

Because nowadays, racism is, I would say, regarded as an almost metaphysical curse that can only originate from Whites, with others considered exempt from it by nature. This is why anti-white racism is never — or hardly ever — prosecuted, and neither is the anti-Semitism of Muslims. Non-Europeans, and especially Muslims, are seen as intrinsic victims and are therefore blameless and untouchable.

In the French Constitution, all references to the notion of race have been abolished, with the word itself having suddenly been removed, as if by some sort of exorcism, and the very notion apparently declared scientifically inexistent (despite the fact that all current scientific tendencies espouse the opposite interpretation, but never mind). This does not, of course, prevent them from punishing the ‘racism’ of writers and speakers ever more severely, on the basis of an object which, both officially and legally, does not even exist. We have thus reached a point where although the very inexistence of fish has been decreed, one is still forbidden to indulge in fishing…

In actual fact, this anti-racist obsession is but a racial one which, by means of a heterotelic effect, spreads throughout society and impacts everyone, regardless of their origin.

The Increased Obviousness of Racial Antagonism

Which is precisely why, in the event of an outbreak of civil war, the ethnic (i.e. religious, cultural, linguistic, traditional, etc.) dimension will be combined with another, much more serious aspect — that of a racial conflict. In this regard, it would seem that the vindictive and militant organisation known as CRAN (Representative Council of Black Associations) will play a very significant role. Indeed, CRAN is the very first overtly racial and racist association tolerated by the authorities and will take charge of various activities targeting both our native French population and law enforcement forces the moment obvious hostilities break out.

This racialisation of conflicts is already encountered at the discreet level of sociological observation and can, likewise, be conclusively perceived through the simple use of one’s common sense: a simple enumeration of all irregularities, riots, arsons, assaults, daily incidents, and individual and collective Muslim attacks clearly reveals the presence of two distinct populations: on the one hand, the Afro-Maghrebian one and, on the other, our own natives, who, it must be said, are not all French but often include integrated and peaceful European immigrants and mixed-raced individuals who suffer as much as the others. None of this has evaded our genuine population’s attention, and, despite its rather high sophistication, the official anti-racist, deracialising and propagandic discourse is no longer accepted. The latter will not be able to defuse the bomb of an acknowledged and experienced logic, namely that of a brewing racial conflict! There can be no mistake on either side: our jerseys are truly not of the same colour.1

Anti-White Racism Presented as Anti-Racism

At this level, one can readily assess the extent to which these mentally complexed allogeneous individuals — all of whom are ill at ease in their own skin, in the throes of a biological sort of resentment and mediocre good-for-nothings — have been stricken with schizophrenia.

Although anti-racism is a hazy ideology, it is simultaneously seen as an imperious and chic creed by the snobbish, mundane and social-climbing elites that propagate it. For the supposed racist is, in their eyes, not only despicable, but also an old-fashioned hick; a white one, of course, and one that becomes the focus of their derision (as seen in Yves Boisset’s propaganda film Dupont Lajoie).3 The invading Islamic forces have taken full advantage of their adversaries’ disabling discrepancy, in which the latter’s dogmatic anti-racism is combined with a pathological sort of guilt relating to their own nature and history. Islam, along with its minions, generals and collaborators, thus makes the most of things to present itself as a victim, as being stigmatised by a certain form of racism, before tearfully launching its ruthless conquest. Its deceptive song and dance is, however, something that an ever-increasing number of people are now familiar with.

Anti-racism has become a self-destructive concept, not only because it can be applied to virtually anything but, most importantly, because it leads to anti-white racism and hatred for France’s European identity. Moreover, it is one of the main factors contributing to the decline of freedom of expression and the judicialisation of debates, which brings us closer to the situation of totalitarian countries, whose taboos and protected dogmas one is forbidden to transgress. Yet again, through a heterotelic kind of backlash, anti-racism results in the opposite effect to the one intended, fostering the resurgence of racist theories that come across as being nonconformist. Braving the intelligentsia, Pascal Bruckner writes: ‘Anti-racism ends up delegitimising the very idea of a fight against racism, a fight that takes on a disproportionate attitude and contradicts its own terms.’ The exclusion of white people is not considered a sign of racist discrimination, since white men themselves are obviously the source of all discrimination and racism…

What is alarming is that our courts accept these masquerades and investigate the accusations, complaints and lawsuits filed by the members of pro-immigration, vindictively Muslim and Islamo-leftist anti-racist back rooms, with the notion of our indigenous population’s unbearably racist Islamophobia always lurking in the background.

A Highly Charged Society Undergoing Gradual Racialisation

Speaking of those immigrants and people of colour one encounters everywhere, a friend of mine, who happens to be a professor of sociology (the discipline that prefers observation to speculation), recently pointed out to me that what they basically do is ‘raise their heads, act arrogantly and proceed to provoke us. For many years now, their attitude in public spaces has been both aggressive and irritable. They constantly demand our “respect”’.

In this deeply racialised society pervaded by a detestable anti-racist vulgate that exclusively targets white racism, Islam enjoys an abnormal status: it is increasingly accepted as both the religion and the emblem of coloured people, i.e. of the eternally oppressed (yet largely aided, privileged and subsidised), at a time when massacres and oppressive actions are gleefully carried out in its name. It is all part of a pathological paradox in which the executioner presents himself as the condemned.

Racial Civil War is Guillaume Faye’s final work. Pre-order the limited leather-bound edition now — only 8 copies left (out of 50) — before it’s too late, right here at the Arktos Shop.

Footnotes