What happened in Romania in the first week of December was shocking beyond words, unprecedented and in-your-face. For the first time in post-war history, we witnessed a direct and unconcealed intervention from the international deep state in the election process of an independent country. But as always, this mind-blowing chain of events was everything but unexpected and fits in a pattern the world has been well aware of since 2014 when comparable things happened in Ukraine. In this article, I will describe how this hijacking of democracy exactly works, which has become possible now that we have the Romanian case. This will be achieved by comparing the Romanian case with Brazil, where former president Jair Bolsonaro received a comparable ‘treatment’ to that of his Romanian counterpart Câlin Georgescu. Where needed, the argument will be strengthened by presenting evidence from Ukraine. The similarities between these cases are stunning and show us the intricate workings of the shadow world government.
1. Source of the Intervention: USA
Almost immediately after the Supreme Court cancellation of the second round of the presidential election in Romania, information became public that a secret flight from Florida had landed in Bucharest moments before the fateful decision. The X account of Daily Romania wrote: ‘There are rumours that the Biden administration pushed the judges into cancelling the elections which Câlin Georgescu would have won.’ This is, of course, a replay of the well-documented CIA intervention in Kiev in 2014. But a closer look at what happened in Brazil between August 2021 and February 2023 completely lifts the veil that covered this type of transatlantic intervention until now.
In October 2022, elections took place there for the presidency. Contenders were deep state stooge Lula da Silva and the ‘Georgescu of Brasilia’ Jair Bolsonaro. In August 2021, Jake Sullivan, one of the main deep state operatives in Washington, arrives in Brazil to implement a media strategy that should bring Lula to victory. The hallmarks of this strategy are a copy of the strategy in the USA against Donald Trump: Bolsonaro will manipulate the elections; Bolsonaro will not accept an election loss; Bolsonaro sows doubt about the electronic systems which are ‘reliable without a shadow of doubt’. This last point was given such prominence and emphasis that the Supreme Court judge ‘supervising’ the elections, together with the then acting ambassador of the USA, issued a ‘safety guarantee’ for the elections. Note the important role of the Supreme Court, just like in Romania. I will come to that later. Bolsonaro had proof that the system was rigged but could not break this ‘iron-clad safety guarantee’. Lula won with 50,9% of the vote. Four months after his victory, Lula visits Joe Biden to discuss ‘reparations of relationship’ after the ‘disastrous’ Bolsonaro years (February 2023). There is another stunning parallel that proves the deep level of USA involvement in Brazilian politics: the ‘storming’ of government buildings in Brasilia on 8 January 2023, which is an exact copy of what happened in Washington on 6 January 2020. In both cases, this was a US deep state-led operation that used infiltrants and provocateurs aiming to criminalize the ‘patriot’ presidential contenders.
2. Working Through the Supreme Court
As pointed out, the Brazilian Supreme Court played a decisive role in rigging the elections of 2022. In Romania, its role is even more prominent. In both cases, the national judges were ‘approached’ by deep state enforcers from the USA. When we bring the Ukrainian case into play here, we see the same pattern: we all remember Joe Biden bragging about ‘having the annoying prosecutor fired’ by blocking a billion of US funding. Top-level judges are, in many cases, corrupt and prone to blackmail. Paedophilia plays an important role here. The CIA is supposed to have files about many important international judges, fed by material that is obtained in Epstein-style situations.
3. ‘Populist’ Contenders Are Marching to a Clear Victory
Before the ‘transatlantic intervention’, the populist candidates enjoyed an insurmountable lead over their deep state competitors. In Romania, Georgescu surged from a single-digit position to a stunning 23% of the vote in the first round. Days before the annulled second round, his lead grew to 63%. In Brazil, independent polling showed similar numbers for Bolsonaro before 2022 — although there was a lot of Hillary Clinton-style ‘American’ polling going on, too (remember: before the 2016 elections, Clinton had a ‘93% chance’ to beat Trump). How huge the gap between Bolsonaro and Lula really was (and still is) came to light in the 2024 municipal elections. News.az wrote: ‘The 2024 municipal elections showed significant gains for right-wing forces, particularly those aligned with former President Jair Bolsonaro. His party made considerable inroads in various municipalities, demonstrating that Bolsonaro’s influence remains strong, even after losing the presidency.’ The gap also appears in a tsunami of videos online that show Bolsonaro being cheered and applauded by the people in places like markets, airplanes and restaurants while Lula can’t walk the streets without eggs, tomatoes, excrement and stones being thrown at him. Similar situations we also see in Ukarine 2014, Moldova 2024 and Georgia 2024. So, without transatlantic intervention, these countries would have been lost to the ‘new world order’ of the likes of Soros and Gates.
4. Trump Very Much Involved
Both the victims of the transatlantic intervention in Brazil and Romania were and are strongly supported by Donald Trump. This proves that we are dealing with American politics by proxy. In Ukraine, we see that the beneficiaries of the 2014 intervention are strongly opposed to Trump.
5. American-Style Lawfare Against Populists
The cancellation of the presidential second round in Romania doesn’t mean that Georgescu is destroyed politically. He could do as well in a second first round as he did in the first first round — or better as he can profit from the outrage of the people over the intervention. So what is needed is a ‘neutralization’ of the man and the ‘transatlantic’ way to do that is through ‘lawfare’ or weaponization of the judiciary (see also under 2). Immediately after the cancellation of the second round, Georgescu was ‘approached’ by the national prosecutor and accused of ‘electoral crimes’ and ‘money laundering’. This is one-to-one comparable with what was done to Bolsonaro, who was accused of ‘genocide’ over his Covid response, attempts to ‘steal the election’, ‘organizing a popular uprising’, stealing state property (they said his wife kept ‘illegally’ some jewellery given to her by foreign heads of state) and ‘faking his vaccination card’ (among other things). All this was aimed — just like with Georgescu — at neutralizing him as a presidential contender. Notwithstanding all these accusations, Bolsonaro has made it clear that he will be on the ballot in 2026 for the next presidential elections. Of course, this whole lawfare strategy was developed in the USA from 2015 onwards when Trump, for the first time, announced his bid for the White House.
6. Appeal on Populist Values Enrages Deep State
When we compare the footage on the internet of Georgescu and Bolsonaro, specific characteristics stand out. Both like to show themselves in rural settings, in nature, with animals and/or agricultural gear. They like to dress in traditional costumes and/or the colours of their countries. They emphasize physical well-being and/or sports, ride horses and/or motorcycles and both emphatically profess their religious feelings. Both politicians exude a Jack Kerouac-style thirst for ‘freedom’ in all its forms, specifically freedom of speech and freedom of the press. All these things enrage the deep state powers for whom the implementation of a dictatorial global monoculture is one of their main goals. This type of characterization, of course, strongly aligns with what we see of Trump and, less so, Putin. From the perspective of the deep state, this type of populist represents a mortal danger and should be neutralized at all costs. Just think about the globalist wars on farming and farmers and the globalist drive into censorship and you understand immediately how ‘dangerous’ these guys are for the globalist agenda.
In this overview, I showed how a specific political situation everywhere in the world leads to the implementation of a specific ‘transatlantic’ playbook to prevent countries from leaving the new world order as planned by the Gates-Soros globalists. The infamous ‘colour revolution’ that we saw in Ukraine, which was launched (but failed) in Serbia and is now being waged in Georgia, is part of this playbook. Of course, deeper in the vaults of history, we find comparable situations like Iran/Mosaddeggh 1953, Congo/Lumumba 1961 and Chile/Allende 1973, but these took place under completely different circumstances before the birth of ‘populism’ or the rise to prominence of people like George Soros and Bill Gates.
Thanks.