Skip to main content

Alexander Dugin emphatically dismisses the possibility of a truce with the West and advocates a rational, decisive strategy for a Russian victory amidst the escalating conflict in Ukraine.

The future remains a mystery, an open book that no one can read with certainty. The same can be said about the present and the past; our understanding of them is far from absolute, resulting in diverse interpretations. The future is even more uncertain, especially when considering the ongoing brutal and intimidating conflict we are experiencing now—a battle waged against the united forces of the West.

When it comes to the future, all we can do is formulate hypotheses and devise strategies. These two elements are intrinsically linked. The hypotheses we develop influence our strategies; conversely, the strategies we create can also shape our hypotheses.

There are two main hypotheses:

  • Reconciliation is possible, and there are forces in the US (in the West) that are ready to stop Zelensky.
  • Reconciliation is impossible until Russia achieves a complete surrender of Kiev and factual control over the entire territory of Ukraine (i.e., fulfils the set goals of demilitarisation and denazification).

Hence the strategies:

  • Based on the first hypothesis, our strategy should be to bide our time and strive for negotiations.
  • Based on the second hypothesis, we need to prepare for total war to the end, to the limit, to complete victory. Like in the Great Patriotic War. Not necessarily to Berlin or the English Channel, but to Lvov for sure.

If we proceed from the first hypothesis, we create the preconditions for reconciliation. Of course, we fight, but with a nod towards a truce.

If we adopt the second hypothesis, the notion of a truce is disregarded entirely. Our attention is exclusively dedicated to the conduct of war. Any deficiencies preventing us from victory are addressed and rectified. If there are those among us who are unable or unwilling to engage in the fight as required, we replace them. If the attitudes of the elite and wider society stand in the way of victory, we work to transform these attitudes. This could mean changing certain sections of the elite or societal groups. This is because the nature of war demands such actions.

I firmly believe that a truce is unattainable. We may be presented with conditions so severe that accepting them would cause Russia’s entire political system to crumble. This is because the Russian people, especially those who have been deeply affected by the war, losing loved ones and faithfully following Putin into battle, would find such terms unacceptable.

I would entirely dismiss the first hypothesis. It seems improbable from an external perspective and would invariably result in internal system collapse, even if someone externally tries to defy logic and enforce it.

What remains is to operate under the guidance of the second hypothesis. However, this calls for a completely different strategy.

In 2014, the authorities were able to convince us of the existence of a ‘cunning strategy’. However, there was none. What we had instead was poor planning rooted in inaccurate assumptions. At that time, the appropriate course of action should have been to mobilise our troops and advance as far as we could. But we faltered; we put our faith in a truce. We were misled, a fact that even the president himself conceded. The deception continued, and, without a doubt, it will happen again. Intriguingly, there was internal assistance in perpetuating this self-deception. It would be fascinating to discover who was involved…

What we require now is not a ‘cunning strategy’ but a rational and carefully calibrated plan for victory. Every necessary action for its execution, even those measures that might be ‘unpopular’, should be enacted as swiftly as possible. In the context of modern warfare, speed often dictates the outcome. We cannot afford to be swayed by anyone or anything at this juncture. It is definitely not a time to be preoccupied with elections or popularity ratings.

Here is our situation: a truce appears highly improbable, while the likelihood of an all-out war seems almost inevitable. Both these scenarios rule out the continuation of peacetime politics. We have experienced this before but did not fully comprehend the situation.

Therefore, what we need is a champion for victory. Someone who is rational, determined, strong-willed, level-headed, and immune to disinformation and questionable influences. A figure who embodies the Russian spirit.

The Arktos Restoration Initiative

We have handpicked thirty distinguished titles, previously lost to censorship, befitting any refined bookshelf. These esteemed classics are now offered in limited leather-bound editions, with a mere 100 copies per title. Owning one not only grants you a collector’s item but also supports our mission to restore them in paperback for all.

We will sequentially reveal three titles. After each pre-sale set concludes, we will move to the next trio. As each set is claimed, we will ship these treasures, while also making paperback versions available in our online store.

Your contribution aids the metapolitical battle, ensuring that vital ideas and concepts remain accessible to an ever-expanding audience.

IArcheofuturism
$79.50
Pre-Order
Racial Civil War
$79.50
Pre-Order

Translated by Constantin von Hoffmeister

Dr. Alexander Dugin

Alexander Dugin (b. 1962) is one of the best-known writers and political commentators in post-Soviet Russia, having been active in politics there since the 1980s. He is the leader of the International Eurasia Movement, which he founded. He was also an advisor to the Kremlin on geopolitical matters and head of the Department of Sociology at Moscow State University. Arktos has published his books The Fourth Political Theory (2012), Putin vs Putin (2014), Eurasian Mission (2014), Last War of the World-Island (2015), The Rise of the Fourth Political Theory (2017), Ethnosociology (vol. 1–2) (2018, 2019), Political Platonism (2019), The Theory of a Multipolar World (2021), and The Great Awakening vs the Great Reset (2021).

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
12 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Jason Rogers
Member
Jason Rogers
9 months ago
  • Reconciliation is impossible until Russia achieves a complete surrender of Kiev and factual control over the entire territory of Ukraine (i.e., fulfils the set goals of demilitarisation and denazification).

1) While this is likely correct – that Russia really does not have a “truce option” – Dugin’s analysis assumes that any reconciliation is possible through Russian victory. I just don’t see that as possible. Ukrainian nationalists are not likely to be reconciled to Russian leadership/guidance (felt as oppressive) after a Russian victory precisely because they have always distrusted centralized Russian power in Western Ukraine.

2) Moscow’s goal of demilitarization may be possible through Russian victory. Moscow’s goal of *denazification* is not possible, in my view, given that Russian leadership apparently still does not understand *why* Western Ukrainians distrust centralized Russian power.

EuroNat
Member
9 months ago
Reply to  Jason Rogers

Ukrainian nationalists are whores. They trust the west because that’s who literally pays their salaries.

Atlantean
Member
9 months ago
Reply to  EuroNat

I’d tone down the language. Some of them will be back on our side one day.

Alexander Reynor
Member
Alexander Reynor
9 months ago
Reply to  Atlantean

I think they’re doomed regardless of the outcome. Either the Russians win and do away with them or the Ukrainians win and USA/NATO does away with them. Their only hope is to launch a coup against Zelensky and then negotiate a peace with Russia. It is doubtful they will do this though.

Atlantean
Member
9 months ago

This is some of the most coherent Dugin has been in a long time and he is correct. I would add, Russia’s greatest challenge may be getting everyone in internal leadership roles on the same page. Personally, I’d start by firing the heads of the MOD and following the Prigozhin way rather than slowing him down!

Wagnerian
Member
9 months ago
Reply to  Atlantean

His commentary on Wagner would be great to run on Arktos!

EuroNat
Member
9 months ago

we need to prepare for total war to the end, to the limit, to complete victory. Like in the Great Patriotic War. Not necessarily to Berlin or the English Channel, but to Lvov for sure.

Stopping before the Polish border would be very irresponsible. A land bridge to Transnistria should be established and they should be welcomed into the Russian Federation. Temporary control of all of Ukraine will be the only way to prevent an endless guerilla campaign.

Wagnerian
Member
9 months ago
Reply to  EuroNat

No Stop until England!

Wagnerian
Member
9 months ago

Dugin being clear and straightforward. Good insight.

RWBB
Member
9 months ago
Reply to  Wagnerian

A little short on details though.

RWBB
Member
9 months ago

Can Russia win alone? My instincts say no.

EuroNat
Member
9 months ago
Reply to  RWBB

They opened the doors to foreign volunteers today.

12
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x