The Oligarchy’s Collusion with the Invaders

Pope Francis acts as their greatest ally whenever he demands that we welcome them in spite of the fact that so many them adhere to an aggressive and vengeful Islam targeting our own civilisation. The more we help them, save them from drowning and harbour them, the more they come in droves. Such behaviour is utter madness: it is a mixture of masochism and delusional humanitarianism on the part of our authorities, who are thus complicit in the destruction of their own people through populational flooding.

This massive phenomenon, unprecedented in Europe since the beginning of its historical existence, threatens to wreak death upon our civilisation and germen, i.e. upon our ethno-cultural and anthropological foundation, whose roots stretch back several millennia. An extra-European and predominantly Muslim immigration of populations that are much more demographically fertile than ours is akin to the worst form of invasion one could ever experience. And yet the collaborationist elites responsible for organising this invasion do not care at all. They are not concerned with protecting their compatriots and their children any more than they are with safeguarding the memory of their ancestors. They despise their own past and future and exist in a state of absolute presentism, with an extra morbid dose of self-flagellation added — not to mention a pathological anxiety to satisfy their own short-term desires, without ever managing to do so. This oligarchy will eventually be wiped out — either by its fellow citizens or by its adored invader-protégés. Regardless of who ends up claiming victory in the coming racial civil war, the ones that have chosen to collaborate with the occupiers, i.e. the traitors, will be eliminated by one of the two sides.

Arise, O Desired Storms!

We are experiencing the last days of an Indian summer, the end of a beautiful autumn, beyond which we shall enter a long, icy and sanguinary winter. The Islamic attacks that have been taking place since the mid-1990s have been the warning signs of an apocalypse. And although this might seem a horrible thing to say, it is this apocalypse that may turn out to be the solution, the factor that shall allow us to emerge from it all by finally provoking a reaction on the part of Europeans. If the invasion had taken place peacefully, without any disorder, without Islamic attacks, and without a constantly growing wave of criminality, it would be virtually impossible to mobilise the forces of the Resistance.

Those who reassure us are all deceivers.

Day by day, things take a turn for the worse, as migration and demographic colonisation progress further and Islam gains ground. Our only hope of awakening will thus unfortunately be embodied by this civil war; provided, of course, that ethnic Europeans dare to defend themselves against the attacks…

The worst alternative would have been a smooth invasion, in which our Islamisation, Arabisation or Africanisation would have been conducted peacefully, without violence, using mainly demographical means — a soft invasion. The terrorist violence, delinquency and nuisance caused by these populations have, however, abolished this scenario. Despite the vehement denials made by mediatic propaganda, which finds itself increasingly powerless to disguise the truth, our people are now aware of the fact that a conflict with these foreigners is underway. All the better!

My opinion, an unacceptable one in the eyes of the self-righteous, is that a racial civil war would not be as serious a development as a collapse without conflict, i.e. what Konrad Lorenz termed a ‘lukewarm death’. Indeed, the worst possible occurrence would be for us to surrender without fighting — a progressive agony characterised by demographic and cultural disappearance, population replacement and Islamisation. This is the very scenario which some (political and mediatic) republican left-wing forces, whose members have established their presence at the heart of the state, are striving to implement in a display of great perversity. In fact, it was this ethnocide of French natives that Jean Raspail once labelled ‘the Republic against the Nation’. The paradox is that an outbreak of such a war could ultimately represent an opportunity if one considers the issue from the angle of a historical dialectic, just as Hegel once did. Indeed, a conflict is what shall enable us to resolve the problem, just as a fever eliminates a virus. The worst option would be for us to allow the situation to fester — we shall, instead, have to burst the abscess ourselves.

According to Islamologist Gilles Kepel, author of The Divide (Gallimard, 2016), whose words I shall also quote, both Islamists and the DAESH movement long to trigger, through their aggressions and murders, a violent response on the part our French natives by driving them towards committing acts of reprisal against Muslim immigrants and thus giving rise to a civil war. According to him, it is a matter of dissevering the white middle class so that it turns against Muslims and causes the latter to ‘enlist in the movement in the name of Islamophobia’. According to Charles Jaigu, who commented on Kepel’s words, the aim is allegedly the following: ‘to erect the caliphate on the ruins of Christian Europe in the aftermath of a general civil war’ (Le Figaro, 24th November, 2016). Although astute, this interpretation of the facts is a perverse one, because it incriminates the French in advance, judging them guilty of wanting to defend themselves by reacting and thus triggering a war, when they are actually the ones who were attacked first!

My position is an entirely different one: a confrontation has become indispensable if we are to resolve the problem, remediate the situation and free ourselves. In this regard, these Islamist provocations, whose purpose is to spark off a civil war, are dialectically positive for us Whites and perhaps even suicidal for them if the events result in our awakening.

If one keeps pulling the sleeping tiger by the tail, it will awaken.