Skip to main content

Rose Sybil unravels the nuanced interactions between genetics, environment, and societal behaviors.

Also see parts onetwothreefourfive, and six.

Epigenetics, Behavioral Sink, Lysenkoism, and Intra-Race Relations

Liberalism, as in globohomo, is not solely a product of any specific culture, despite common attributions of blame to the West. Rather, it is a consequence of behavioral sink, commonly misunderstood as proximity-induced but I believe it is fundamentally related to extreme entropy. Organic systems possess safety mechanisms that, when activated by an imbalanced consumptive impetus, trigger a self-destructive epigenetic response. That is why when animals are given more space and more energy, they expand with rapid replacement. When you add this relational objective vantage to the experiment of behavioral sink, we see that the difference in parameters is that those experiments confine living space with unlimited energy access via food. The excess of energy access causes self-destruction, lower replacement rates, homosexuality, infanticde, weird mating strategies and much more. We can see the relational process of expanding consumption and eventual behavioral sink in self-consumption when the consumptive (highly entropic) void hijacks the competitive impetus. This dynamic is often misconstrued as poor genetics, overlooking the interplay between creative and destructive impetuses within living systems and the range of potential phenotypic outcomes from genotype.

Lysenkoism starts from this same simplistic, linear method of reasoning and distorts a more integrative understanding of epigenetics and the complex interplay between psychic, social, physiological processes and toxic exposure. Lysenkoism is the perfect example of viewing people mechanically or as interchangeable parts with simple input of environment and output of physical change (I would say macro-physical traits are the least changed other than physical health and the age of exposure is exponentially greater with earlier age, i.e., formative potential). It is reductive to easily quantifiable and fully causal relationships that become easy to “debunk” by the same simplistic methods and framing. Then many dismiss the concept of epigenetics altogether by mere association with a simplistic input vs. output model.

Lysenkoism does not discredit the idea of epigenetics as much as it does a specific version of it that treats all people as having the same innate potential. The greater the genotype’s potential, the more environment will affect the range of outcome for the individual phenotype. Likewise, the earlier in life the exposure to various epigenetic influences, the greater its effect on resulting phenotype because of greater formative potential in youth, just like with greater formative potential from a greater genotype. This is why the strain of upholding the other races and consumerism through globalizing has epigenetically harmed Europeans the most. The strain of unnaturally holding up this system not only creates negative epigenetic effects but cumulatively serves as a dysgenic selective pressure against our bonds and the quality of replacement. From the foundation of an integrative process vantage of epigenetics, we could easily see that one group upholding another would be against the competitive impetus in evolution and detrimental to the bonds of the creative impetus of the people. Long supply chains subsidize international oligopolies and primitive expansion for globalist replacement — the strain of this system is placed on working and middle class Whites to do so. The deterioration of our social structures is a product of both behavioral sink and this system fragmenting our foundations with harsh basic need inflation at a far greater rate than general inflation for the subsidies we give big business and refugees/migrants/minorities while leaving electrically addictive outlets more accessible. The strain of upholding this or giving “Lamarkian” epigenetic help to other races leads to negative epigenetic strain on the race with the greatest potential range of expression.

The linear and detached thinking of Lysenkoism is contradictory to nature. Placing Whites as somehow responsible for other races’ behavior by not giving them an even higher standard of living and favorable epigenetics goes fully against nature. It ignores the ceiling effect or that some groups would inherently cause their own negative environments and leaving them to a natural state would be far more detrimental to them on average but far less to us. It bases the idea that more money or resources equates to positive epigenetics but, as we can see with behavioral sink, that is not always the case. It is a qualitative nature of bonding that allows for resilience through overcoming natural hardship with others — and it is that very quality that is drained in the life force of our creative impetus in this system. It was also the quality that propelled not only our inclusive fitness but creative genius that sets us apart from other races. Their lower competitive impetus parallels their diminished creative impetus which is why the most inwardly altruistic apexes are outwardly the most vicious — high formative potential that is inverted into consumerist competition and destructive outward altruism. Giving more money to primitives will not fix their epigenetics, not only because they have low formative potential but also because it will only lead to them joining the ranks of behavioral sink with even greater dysfunction. Money is the medium by which entropy is maximized on the micro and macro level, but it is also addictive so the lack of it can harm and lead to isolation as much as accumulating enough can. The only parts the stoics got wrong was not realizing the distinctions between passions and addictions. The lack of bonds leads to consuming voids and addictions, including consumerism.

We do not need a balance of multipolarity between unequal parts, but between the descendants of the Heroic Age.

The idea that Europeans just cause negative epigenetics for other groups and this blame is supposed to make us uphold them is against every aspect of evolution itself, which is not a mechanical process but a complex interconnected system, something that reflects the need to reintegrate the sciences constantly. Gaia theory and Darwinism had major holes and were in opposition, especially at their onsets. The latter has an inherent materialist paradigm, which is its main issue and not that species evolve. Eventually, Gaia theory was able to incorporate many more advanced theories, not just Darwinism, like horizontal gene transference, symbiosis, inclusive fitness and much more. It still needs to be expanded upon, and that is the first step to knowledge to be aware of how much we do not know. As stand-alone theories in their inception, they were opposing each other, but with further integration we see these relational imperfect objective vantages were not mutually exclusive. The same will have to happen with epigenetics, and its distortion by the current system should not be a reason to dismiss the concepts all together. Globalists have done the same thing with environmentalism that I described in this series and then utilize a false solution to further their destruction of all our foundations.

The point of explaining how the system harms us is not to say that we are victims of the system. Being apex predators requires the will to live and the cost of that is sacrifice in the image of the sacrifice of energy to create the physical world. We must will ourselves to reground into the living chain of connection with the creative and competitive impetuses that stem from our evolutionary strategy as bonding and altruistic yet warriorish beings. The interplay between the creative impetus and the competitive impetus is a process by which we continue to grow as apex predators with inclusive fitness. Europids must pull out of the system in a manner that harms it. We must not look to what is useful within it or we will build our own prisons from which we will insidiously implode as the sacrifice. Being able to do this in time opens the possibility to a future we can rebuild from but must never repeat this again.

Tech will be advanced no matter what through competition, but the cost is too great on living systems that it slows and obscures scientific advancement and weakens us to globalist shadow rule while spreading our technology to other races not meant for it. Any race given the technics of another unnaturally is not going to live authentically and to do so is sacrilege against the balance of the competitive impetus with the life impetus. The races are distinct and have quantitative inequalities even if they should be understood through their own relative perspectives, which is a qualitative evaluation. We do not share a creative impetus with other subspecies or races, thus sharing technics made of our competitive impetus is inherently globalizing.

Those that were and are sustained by global trade and aid to industrialize will fall back to a minimal balance with nature and should be left to a natural state in their respective regions. Their expansion is a result of globalization and is inseparable from it. What is unnaturally expanded is a sacrifice either way, trying to prevent this or hope for some stalemate of nations by giving them more technics they are not meant to have will only lead to greater destruction. The duty of a new heroic confederation will be to prevent the external apparatus of decadent empires from ever again expanding to trading and consuming resources or primitive populations. We do not need a balance of multipolarity between unequal parts, but between the descendants of the Heroic Age. A confederation of the Global North with responsibility for our inventions and their consequences.

Archeofoundationism: A Living Continuum between Heaven and Earth

True advancement cannot stem from materialism or detached power structures, as they only exacerbate societal disunity and hinder the discovery of unknown unknowns. The issue lies not in determining the best abstracted political or economic system, but in recognizing that they all are detached from those who uphold them, driven by a consumptive/hyperproductive force. We require genuine foundations and a departure from consumer-driven technology that supplants the meaningful and bonding aspects of life. Transhumaism and transsexuals are both rooted in the temptation of creation itself to use knowledge to circumvent the lived condition and usurp essence of the living absolutes they are a part of. Both are rooted in a whole made of the sum of its parts. Both ignore essence driving Being and Becoming, and both are a continuation from the shift into humanism which resulted from the detachment of theism and abstraction of revelation from the living chain of existence. We can advance technology and the competitive impetus cannot be removed either as much as the creative cannot detach from it, but to think we can remake reality in our own image to supplant the meaningful hardships of life is to destroy it and negate that we are part of the living absolutes as co-creators.

We need to advance technology under the control of our people, grounding us in a living chain of existence and wonder rather than within an abstracted, top-down governing and economic system. Recognizing the consumptive nature of technology when applied to living systems is crucial for understanding its place. The pervasive entropy within our system taxes the time and energy of the average person, as job specialization can lead to an excess of time for wonder but also its antithesis in excessive material accumulation, creating distance between people greater than the physical and a void that is never filled. The superfluous drains our systems, time, and understanding of reality, robbing us of meaning, bonds, and creativity. It feeds off of the life force of our creative impetus.

Human perfection and technical perfection are incompatible. If we strive for one, we must sacrifice the other: there is, in any case, a parting of the ways. Whoever realizes this will do cleaner work, one way or the other.

Technical perfection strives towards the calculable, human perfection towards the incalculable. Perfect mechanisms — around which, therefore, stands an uncanny but fascinating halo of brilliance — evoke both fear and Titanic pride which will be humbled not by insight but only by catastrophe.

The fear and enthusiasm we experience at the sight of perfect mechanisms are in exact contrast to the happiness we feel at the sight of a perfect work of art. We sense an attack on our integrity, on our wholeness. That arms and legs are lost or harmed is not yet the greatest danger.

— Ernst Jünger

The insight given here is essential after the catastrophe and cannot prevent it, but it can change its nature, either ending in a false “golden” age that consumes us or regrounding our foundations to usher in a New Heroic Age. The competitive and creative impetuses in human connection and technological innovation can be synergized by inverting the material void and rebuilding from the foundations with these understandings passed down. Scientific thought requires the creative impetus to not fall to scientism, placing an input and output linear relationship where nonlinear processes in living interconnectedness reign. By separating living systems from rapid technological change, we can better understand living systems and advance integrative sciences and technology. Grounding people in nature and organic bonds that include some level of struggle and personalization of craft allows for the wonder and creative contributions of science and meaning in life and the physical realm. The spirit is drained by the material which is not synonymous with physical matter but relating to it as a stasis outside of the natural world, which is a spiritual foil for the creation of meaning and transference of energy into living potential.

Hyper-war and AI advancement should not justify granting more control to corrupt, dehumanizing governing organizations. Remember Agenda 2030 zone is the West, Europe and Israel, so the combined competitive impetus can be enslaved to innovate. Innovating more now for the system or building within it only helps Agenda 2030. Rather than centralized structures, we need systems inherently less susceptible to hyper-war and the consumptive nature of technology. Rural areas lacking drone infrastructure and barriers to satellite data acquisition can serve as less vulnerable alternatives to high-tech urban centers. The need to compete is important, but we should not let fear of technology drive current centralization but instead need a strategic smaller implosion caused by re-attachment to cement the bonds of localities to form a stratocracy. Leadership must be grounded in what it leads, and the competitive impetus of governance must sacrifice for the life of the culture rather than being conserved with decadence and use. Separating citizens from an abstracted governing state and back to living precepts within the living absolutes of formative cultural vantages requires sacrifice for inclusive fitness. We must distinguish the realms of the competitive and creative impetuses and their interplay in a way that can foster our growth without detachment, which requires the effort of laying the groundwork of integrative sciences before blundering forward.

Archeofoundationism will help ground both women and men in communities that prioritize the balance of the creative and competitive impetuses, reflecting the complementary roles of men and women in the horseshoe of creation.

People regrounding into localities to pull out of this system will be the foundation of a new order. The localities will be left to a more rugged rural existence that fosters strong bonds and authentic cultures, where our Weltanschauung can be grounding in the interconnectedness of our living chain of existence. Currently our perception is limited by living in such detachment and surrounded by things in their most entropic state. Craftsmanship has our creative impetus and that of other aspects of the life and death cycle. It has the meaning of the experience and shaping between living beings immersed in the rebirth cycle of all our ancestors. Our sense perception is not made for civilization but to be in the garden of the rebirth cycle with the living stories of our ancestors, their ashes and bones part of the interconnected cycle of life around us. The method by which we live affects our perception and intuition, but in this system for many it goes haywire. There is the feeling that something is wrong being masked by the pharmaceutical globalizing oligopoly.

These localities will give rise to a conscriptive stratocracy, uniting men in a brotherhood of warrior rulership with rotating federal and local duties. This government will be for the people and by the people, avoiding the weaknesses of voting systems. Technological innovation will be controlled within the stratocracy as part of the competitive impetus, and grounding leadership in localities will ensure that technology serves a protective role and the creative impetus seeks unknown unknowns with three kings from the Life Giver’s lineage to rule as heads of spiritual matters and the executive. Technology will be limited in its consumer applications, with a focus on areas like public transport, while mass production will no longer shape society. Instead, there will be a resurgence of local craftsmanship, regenerative agriculture, herbalism, traditional healing, and other creative expressions balanced with blood bonds between localities in serving as brothers in arms and marriage across regions to unite.

No legal system can repair the bonds between people, and a balance between the sexes will require a systemic shift. In the current consumer-driven society, men and women harm each other and often view each other as commodities. Women have lost our traditional support networks to mechanization, leaving us isolated and in superficial competition. This has stripped women of our communities and meaning beyond sexual value, and men beyond the ability to provide which is easily then fallen to other means of monetization like OnlyFans. Men cannot replace the emotional support provided by a community of women, and this often strains marriages for women expecting them to do so. Archeofoundationism will help ground both women and men in communities that prioritize the balance of the creative and competitive impetuses, reflecting the complementary roles of men and women in the horseshoe of creation.

The mat(t)er grows to be able to house the consciousness that created it. Mater being turned into the material in a consumptive death/competitive impetus’s imbalance will destroy the foundations of all life and the female half of the divine. We need to organize in the image of the divine couple with the union of Artemis and Apollo or Shakti and Rudra. Mother Nature and Sky Father are a continuum. They are not mutually exclusive but a living chain of connection and interplay of meaning that balance each other. This is like the balance between the sun and earth in photosynthesis, the sun sacrificing himself in a divine union of photosynthesis to bring negative entropy to our semi-closed system, so that in his loving embrace mater grows up to meet him in the beauty of all of nature. Their holy union of sacrifice and life and death balance allows for the foil of meaning and connected changing of forms to exist. Life and death are in the image of the continual rebirth and sacrifice of the continuum of all divine forces from the chthonic to the natural to the celestial and it is within these living absolutes that we must base the processes we live by or be wiped out as a parasitical simulacrum that inverts both life and death into a stasis of forms as capable of rebirth as plastic.

The desert is growing; the faded, infertile spheres are multiplying. The fields which gave life purpose are disappearing; so are the gardens from which one can take nourishment without suspicion, the sheds which have familiar tools. The laws have become dubious, the weapons double-edged. Woe to him who harbors deserts; who does not contain, be it only in one cell, the substance which ever again guarantees fertility.

— Ernst Jünger

The Arktos Restoration Initiative

We have handpicked a few distinguished titles, previously lost to censorship, befitting any refined bookshelf. These esteemed classics are now offered in limited leather-bound editions, with a mere 100 copies per title. Owning one not only grants you a collector’s item but also supports our mission to restore them in paperback for all.

Your contribution aids the metapolitical battle, ensuring that vital ideas and concepts remain accessible to an ever-expanding audience.

IArcheofuturism (Limited Edition)
Racial Civil War (Limited Edition)
Rose Sybil

Rose Sybil, born in California’s Bay Area in the late 1980s, was influenced by the contrasting cultures of Silicon Valley and the Midwest plains. With interests spanning various academic subjects, she believes in a dynamic spiritual growth process, drawing on diverse religious traditions such as Odinism, Taoism, and Vedicism. Passionate about preserving cultural uniqueness, Rose enjoys art, dancing, music, and outdoor activities. As a mother of two, she finds deep meaning in motherhood and is committed to celebrating the union of man and wife, the continuation of life through children, and the rich tapestry of world cultures while standing against the threat of globalism.

Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x